Cinesnatch

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Monday, December 10, 2012

Best Actress 1998: Thin, Pure, Virginal

Posted on 10:25 PM by Unknown
2012 has been a very strange year for the Best Actress category, especially considering what a competitive year 2011 was. Jennifer Lawrence arrived out of the blue as a weakish frontrunner in September, only to be possibly usurped by surprise contender Jessica Chastain. What's unusual is that you have two rising ingenue-types battling out, verses it being a race with only one against someone of more veteran status. While it's not that rare for a twentysomething or early thirtysomething who hasn't been around Hollywood that long to take home an Oscar for Best Actress, it's not that common for her to have serious competition from someone who fits the same mold. The last year that happened was 1998. It seemed pretty clear that Gwyneth Paltrow, then aged 26, was going to walk up to the podium in her Pepto-Bismol-colored dress, acknowledge her four competitors, and talk about how much she loved her father, all thanks to Harvey Weinstein.  Paltrow had quite a year and career in a relatively short amount of time.  Five years before, she made a splash in Flesh and Bone and subsequently took small roles in tiny, prestige projects.  She generated attention as the love interest in The Pallbearer the same summer she headlined the arthouse hit Emma and hit paydirt.  People seemed to like the young actress at least at low levels.  In 1998, she released five films of varying genres: Big Hollywood thriller, rural mystery, a Charles Dickens update, a modern double-billed drama, and the 16th-century Shakespeare in Love.  For Paltrow, there was simply a perfect storm brewing, and she had benefited from her connections, age, and looks.

Daddy's Little Girl
Of course, it didn't hurt that her film, Shakespeare in Love, was a period romance that showcased her doing a British accent, dabbling in drag, appearing nude, and looking absolutely gorgeous thanks to cinematographer Richard Greatrex (who now does TV mini-series) and director John Madden (the Tom Hooper of his day?).  She also played an ambitious actress who was ahead of her time and desired to take the stage when it simply wasn't acceptable for her gender.  Though, if we judged this film on its politics alongside its successor, the more sincere and provocative Stage Beauty, it would surely pale in comparison.  Thanks to the well-calculated timed platform release during holiday season, with the awards circuit, nomination announcement, and Oscar night, the $25M production eked over the magical domestic box-office mark with $100.3M (and nearly $300M worldwide).  Paltrow won recognition as the Best Actress of the year from various critic groups including Florida, Kansas City, and San Diego.  She was also nominated by Chicago, Online, BAFTA, and Satellite.  Of course, it was winning the Golden Globe (Comedy) and the SAG that truly sealed the deal, along with, as competitor Fernanda Montenegro (Central Station) would put it, her having a "thin, pure, virginal appearance."  (Not one to mince words, Montenegro also said that Robert Benigni was incorrectly awarded Best Actor also that year.)   She went on to comment how this "rare" commodity was an investment for Hollywood, though looking at the returns, smart stockholders jumped ship pretty quickly.  After her capital gained her admission into a couple of auteurist visions, she delivered one flop after another: Bounce, Shallow Hal, Duets, Possession, View from the Top, and Sylvia.  

I traded in Brad Pitt for this
A Golden Globe (Drama) nominee herself, Montenegro won awards from several critic groups and film festivals: LA, NBR, Berlin, Ft. Lauderdale, Sao Paulo, Havana.  She was also nominated by National Society, New York, Satellite, and Chlotrudis.  Her film grossed an impressive $5.6M, but her age and lack of name recognition didn't play in her favor.  

More competitive that year was newbie Cate Blanchett for her iconic turn as Queen Elizabeth ($30M budget, $30.1M domestic, $82.2M worldwide), her third major feature in a relatively short period of time.  She would lose, ironically enough, to Paltrow's Elizabethan role, whose costar Judi Dench played the same Queen (later on in life) in Shakespeare.  Winning the Golden Globe Drama, Chicago, Las Vegas, Southeastern, Toronto, Broadcast, Online, Satellite, Chlotrudis, BAFTA, Blanchett would also be nominated by SAG, National Society, and Boston (as an actor, she would also develop a more devoted fan base than Paltrow).  Blanchett has gone way beyond the promise she has shown, eventually winning an Oscar, as well as being nominated three more times.  And, at age, 43, she shows no signs of slowing down; in fact, the demand for her abilities has only increased.  

The Other Nominees
-Emily Watson, Hilary and Jackie (AMPAS, SAG, Golden Globe Drama, Chicago, Online, Satellite, Chlotrudis, BAFTA nominee), $4.9M.  Fresh off a nod from two years previously, having wowed audiences with Breaking the Waves, she was again a formidable, but didn't quite fit into that Hollywood mold.  I can't imagine she's smarting for losing twice, though, a win could have done wonders for her career.  

-Meryl Streep, One True Thing (AMPAS, SAG, Golden Globe Drama, Satellite nominee), $23.3M.  If there was ever any doubt that the AMPAS are careful about who they dole out nods to and let into "the club," this would be another example of cock-blocking a newbie, for a perennial nominee they love to just nominate for doing an accent, learning an instrument, or playing a disease.

The Near-Misses
-Jane Horrocks, Little Voice (SAG, Golden Globe Comedy, Boston, Chicago, Satellite, BAFTA nominee), $4.6M.  Probably just missing out on an Oscar nod, she was probably too eclectic (and maybe even too British) for The Academy.  

-Ally Sheedy, High Art (LA, National Society, Independent Spirit winner; Chicago, Chlotrudis nominee; Boston 2nd), $2.0M (Summer release).  Probably a little less pure and virginal than Paltrow, and a little higher up in age, the AMPAS had no interest in recognizing Sheedy's raw, heralded performance.  

The rest of the competition for that year:
-Cameron Diaz, There's Something About Mary (New York winner, Golden Globe Comedy nominee), $176.5M (Summer release).

-Susan Sarandon, Stepmom (San Diego winner, Golden Globe Drama, Satellite nominee), $91.1M.  The AMPAS used to love to nominate her, until she finally won.  And, considering she was "playing cancer," Streep already had that base covered.  

-Christina Ricci, The Opposite of Sex (Satellite winner; Golden Globe Comedy, Chlotrudis nominee), $5.9M.

-Renée Zellweger, One True Thing (New York nominee), $23.3M.

-Samantha Morton, Under the Skin (Boston, Gijón, Angers winner, British Independent nominee), $0.1M (Summer release).

-Holly Hunter, Living Out Loud (Chicago, Satellite nominee), $12.9M (Fall release).

-Meg Ryan, You've Got Mail (Golden Globe Comedy, Satellite nominee), $115.8M.

-Helena Bonham Carter, The Theory of Flight (Satellite nominee), $0.1M.  

-Drew Barrymore, Ever After (Chlotrudis nominee), $65.7M (Summer release).

Paltrow has never been nominated for an Oscar since, though she put out some feelers a few years later with Proof and Country Strong (her best work has been in Two Lovers).  She has been unlucky in finding common ground with audiences or critics, let alone both.  If it weren't for Robert Downey, Jr handpicking her for Pepper Potts in Iron Man, her mini-music career would have never taken place, maybe not even her GOOP newsletter.  But, in 1998, Paltrow no doubt appeared to be a winner, with help from a Weinstein generated hit and a fawning press, and for having, as Montenegro put it, "thin, pure, virginal appearance," which she used to her advantage at exactly the time it mattered.  

Can we make an informed prediction about his year's race through the prism of 1998?  It doesn't seem that way.  Lawrence is quite vocal about how she refuses to thin down to a toothpick and prefers a healthier frame.  And the character she plays is a nymphomaniac.  However, there is a wholesomeness to Lawrence--the actress.  And, unlike Paltrow, Lawrence, who is a product of her times, has a huge franchise behind her.  Hollywood is very invested her career.  Currently, her Silver Linings Playbook is struggling at the box-office.  It's still too early to tell, because the holidays are right around the corner and the awards circuit could help coast it along.  Yet, Playbook, which, for a hot second was considered the lead horse in the Best Picture race, can't just go home empty-handed, can it?  Not when Harvey Weinstein is on the watch.  And Best Actress is its best bet at this point.  Also too early to tell is how Chastain's Zero Dark Thirty will fare.  Despite the massive critical attention, I do wonder if American audiences will cotton to the Osama Bin Laden assassination picture starting the next few weeks.  Political action thrillers seldom do well, and only when they do, do they seem to have a chance at catching Oscar's eye.  Like Paltrow and Blanchett before them, both actresses have a shallow history in Hollywood.  As far as these things go, youth has the edge, and Lawrence is at least a decade younger than Chastain (who remains gloriously mysterious about her age).  

One thing seems likely, though.  Just like Montenegro landed an Oscar nomination for Best Actress having starred in a Foreign Language film, there are two French actresses waiting in the wings for a similar fate.  And perhaps, like Watson, another London-born actress, recent New York Film Critics winner Rachel Weisz (The Deep Blue Sea), may also have a shot at a nod.  Meryl Streep, however, only having superbly played middle-aged in a sexless marriage (Hope Springs), may have to sit this year out.


poll by twiigs.com
Read More
Posted in Best Actress, Gwyneth Paltrow | No comments

Sunday, December 9, 2012

RIP Saturday Night Live Live

Posted on 12:01 PM by Unknown
I've discontinued watching Saturday Night Live live these days.  Sad but true, I don't have a recorder of any kind.  I've also stopped blogging regularly on the new episodes.  While there is some worthwhile content every now and again, it just isn't worth staying up (or home) for.  What has been an on-again-off-again staple over the decades for me is now fading to black.  I still may catch clips off the NBC website (I imagine there will be a weening off period, as I'm never good with going cold turkey) as I did this morning while exercising.  They usually post all but one or two skits and I never paid close enough attention to discern their methodology behind what makes it on the site and what doesn't. 

From what I saw of last night's episode, the multi-talented Jamie Foxx (whom I've never been too crazy about) was game for putting on a great show.  In his opening monologue, he told a lot of jokes (mostly about race) and then sang while playing the piano.  You can tell he was probably full of ideas and contributed to the content, because he was in practically every skit, including the prerecorded sketch AND a special correspondent spot on Weekend Update (as a Hostess Ding Dong--props to the costumer).  The non-live portion of the show was the best, which had Foxx playing Tyler Perry as Alex Cross AND Madea in one body (in another costuming stroke of genius, which looked like a higher-budget version of Horazio Sanz as Elton John/Rosie O'Donnell singing "Don't Go Breaking My Heart," back in the day).  Kate McKinnon was nowhere to be seen, so I only can assume that she was too under the weather to perform.  Nasim Pedrad only made one bit.  Bill Hader and Fred Armisen completely broke character multiple times while playing valets, due to perhaps some off-camera antics.  The writing wasn't anything special and it was actually funnier to watch them try to maintain composure, which is great in the moment, but, in retrospect, doesn't really speak to the quality of the show.  Dermot Mulroney made a cameo appearance during a game show segment poking fun at the name similarities between himself and Dylan McDermott (did I get the spelling right, LOL?), while three black contestants (a record for SNL?) try to guess which one is which. 

In one segment called "Maine Justice," white residents with money affected by Hurricane Katrina have relocated or spend half their time in the most Northeastern state.  The courtroom skit has Jason Sudeikis as a New Englander judge with a Southern accent and Foxx as his bailiff.  At one point, their characters share an uproarious laugh and Sudeikis leans over to Foxx and randomly kisses his arm.  Did you catch that?  Not a big deal, of course, but just so inexplicably random.  Haven't seen anything on the internet yet. 

There was a bit involving Vanessa Bayer and Cecily Strong (who gets an abnormal amount of airtime as one of the new kids on the block) playing former prostitutes pushing Swarvoski crystals.  Their characters are pretty braindead and possess no self-respect, but are easily distracted by big, sparkly cut-rate diamonds.  While they were mildly amusing, sometimes I wonder if the SNL writing staff views their audience the same way.
Read More
Posted in SNL | No comments

Thursday, December 6, 2012

Oscar Revisionism: 1964

Posted on 10:14 PM by Unknown
The 1964 race for Best Picture was filled with heavy hitters.  (Check out 1965 if you haven't already).  The five films had such commercial and/or critical success, you'd think there would be spillover that could easily round out a Field of Ten.  You'd think.  Strangely, this year was so difficult to figure out, "the front-runner" for additions is Hush ... Hush, Sweet Charlotte, the infamous Bette Davis/Olivia de Havilland horror-thriller which collected an impressive seven nominations.  The genre isn't the type the AMPAS are usually kind to, yet the year was filled with similar movies.  From there, it gets even more difficult.  One thing for sure, though, 1964 wasn't lacking in musicals, mysteries, Peter Sellers, lady's men, or films related to the Cuban Missile Crisis.  What say you?

The Winner

My Fair Lady
The pygmalion storyline starring Rex Harrison and Audrey Hepburn.
Total Wins/Nominations: 8 wins (Picture, Director, Actor, Sound, Adapted Score, Color Cinematography, AD, Costumes), 4 nominations (Supporting Actress, Supporting Actor, Adapted Screenplay, Film Editing)
Other Awards/Nominations: DGA winner, NBR, NYFCC winner, BAFTA winner, Golden Globe (Comedy) winner, WGA
Distributor: Warner Bros. Pictures
Release Date: 21. October
Domestic Box Office:
Budget: $17M (IMDb)
Current RT: 94%
Current IMDb: 7.9

The Nominees
Mary Poppins
Julie Andrews is the nanny who helps make the medicine go down with a spoonful of sugar.
Total Wins/Nominations: 5 wins (Actress, Film Editing, Score, Song, Visual Effects), 8 nominations (Picture, Director, Adapted Screenplay, Adapted Score, Sound, Color Cinematography, AD, Costumes)
Other Awards/Nominations: DGA, Golden Globe (Comedy), WGA winner
Distributor: Buena Vista Distribution Company
Release Date: 27. August
Domestic Box Office: $102M (IMDb)
Budget: $6M (IMDb)
Current RT: 100%
Current IMDb: 7.7

Zorba the Greek
An Englishman and a Greek develop a friendship.
Total Wins/Nominations: 3 wins (Supporting Actress, B&W Cinematography, AD), 4 nominations (Picture, Director, Adapted Screenplay, Actor)
Other Awards/Nominations: NBR, BAFTA, Golden Globe (Drama)
Distributor: International Classics
Release Date: 17. December
Domestic Box Office: N/A
Budget: $0.8M (IMDb)
Current RT: 86%
Current IMDb: 7.7

Dr. Strangelove
Legendary nuclear dark comedy.  
Total Wins/Nominations: 4 nominations (Picture, Director, Adapted Screenplay, Actor)
Other Awards/Nominations: DGA, BAFTA winner, WGA winner
Distributor: Columbia Pictures
Release Date: 29. January
Domestic Box Office: N/A
Budget: $1.8M (IMDb)
Current RT: 100%
Current IMDb: 8.6

Becket
King Henry II makes a fictional account of his friendship with Thomas Becket.
Total Wins/Nominations: 1 win (Adapted Screenplay), 11 nominations (Picture, Director, Actor, Actor, Supporting Actor, Film Editing, Sound, Score, Color Cinematography, AD, Costumes)
Other Awards/Nominations: DGA, Golden Globe (Drama) winner, NBR winner, Laurel Awards (Drama) 4th Place, BAFTA, WGA winner
Distributor: Paramount Pictures
Release Date: 11. March
Domestic Box Office: N/A
Budget: $3M (IMDb)
Current RT: 75%
Current IMDb: 8.0

The Rest ...
Hush … Hush, Sweet Charlotte
Trashy thriller starring Bette Davis and Olivia de Havilland that the AMPAS obviously fell for.
Total Wins/Nominations: 7 nominations (Supporting Actress, Film Editing, Score, Song, B&W Cinematography, AD, Costumes)
Other Awards/Nominations: N/A
Distributor: TCFFC
Release Date: 15. December
Domestic Box Office: $7M (IMDb)
Budget: $2.2M (IMDb)
Current RT: 84%
Current IMDb: 7.5

The Unsinkable Molly Brown
Fictionalized musical about the famous Titanic survivor starring Debbie Reynolds.  While the 1960s were the golden age of the Hollywood musical, would there have been room for three in a Field of Ten?
Total Wins/Nominations: 6 nominations (Actress, Adapted Score, Sound, Color Cinematography, AD, Costumes)
Other Awards/Nominations: Laurel Awards (Musical) winner, Golden Globe (Comedy), WGA
Distributor: MGM
Release Date: 11. June
Domestic Box Office: N/A
Budget: N/A
Current RT: 71%
Current IMDb: 6.5


Father Goose
Cary Grant World War II rom-com.  With three musicals in the mix, would there really be room for a comedy?  
Total Wins/Nominations: 1 win (Original Screenplay), 2 nominations (Film Editing, Sound)
Other Awards/Nominations: Laurel Awards (Comedy) winner, Golden Globe (Comedy), WGA
Distributor: Universal Pictures
Release Date: 10. December
Domestic Box Office: N/A
Budget: N/A
Current RT: 75%
Current IMDb: 7.2

Seven Days in May
Anti-communist conspiracy dramatic thriller.
Total Wins/Nominations: 2 nominations (Supporting Actor, B&W AD)
Other Awards/Nominations: Laurel Awards (Drama) 5thPlace, WGA
Distributor: Paramount Pictures
Release Date: 12. February
Domestic Box Office: N/A
Budget: $2.2M (IMDb)
Current RT: 100%
Current IMDb: 7.9

The Night of the Iguana 
Drama concerning a disgraced cleric (Richard Burton) taking a group of Baptist women on a Mexican tour. 
Total Wins/Nominations: 1 win (B&W Costumes), 3 nominations (Actress, B&W Cinematography, AD)
Other Awards/Nominations: DGA, Laurel Awards (Drama), Golden Globe (Drama)
Distributor: MGM
Release Date: 6. August
Domestic Box Office: N/A
Budget: $3M (IMDb)
Current RT: 71%
Current IMDb: 7.6

Matrimonio all’Italiana (Marriage Italian-Style)
Vittorio De Sica rom-com starring Sophia Loren and Marcello Mastroianni. 
Total Wins/Nominations: 2 nominations (Foreign Language Film, Actress)
Other Awards/Nominations: N/A
Distributor: Embassy Pictures Corporation
Release Date: 20. December
Domestic Box Office: N/A
Budget: N/A
Current RT: N/A
Current IMDb: 7.3
Fail-Safe 
Henry Fonda plays the U.S. president in this war-thriller involving a series of mistakes that could lead to a world war with Russia reminiscent of the Cuban Missile Crisis. 
Total Wins/Nominations: 0
Other Awards/Nominations: Laurel Awards (Drama) 5thPlace
Distributor: Columbia Pictures
Release Date: 15. September
Domestic Box Office: N/A
Budget: N/A
Current RT: 92%
Current IMDb: 8.0



One Potato, Two Potato
Interracial marriage drama. 
Total Wins/Nominations: 1 nomination (Original Screenplay)
Other Awards/Nominations: Cannes, WGA
Distributor: Cinema V
Release Date: 29. July
Domestic Box Office: N/A
Budget: N/A
Current RT: N/A
Current IMDb: 7.3

The Hill
Prison war drama set in Africa starring Sean Connery.
Total Wins/Nominations: 0
Other Awards/Nominations: BAFTA, Cannes
Distributor: MGM
Release Date: 3. October 1965
Domestic Box Office: N/A
Budget: N/A
Current RT: 100%
Current IMDb: 7.9

I Compagni (The Organizer)
Italian film details the plight of a striking working class. 
Total Wins/Nominations: 1 nomination (Original Screenplay)
Other Awards/Nominations: N/A
Distributor: Continental Distributing
Release Date: 6. May
Domestic Box Office: N/A
Budget: N/A
Current RT: N/A
Current IMDb: 8.0




A Hard Day’s Night 
Comedy featuring The Beatles at the height of their fame.
Total Wins/Nominations: 2 nominations (Original Screenplay, Adapted Score)
Other Awards/Nominations: Laurel Awards (Musical) 3rd Place
Distributor: United Artists
Release Date: 11. August
Domestic Box Office: N/A
Budget: $0.6M (IMDb)
Current RT: 100%
Current IMDb: 7.6



The Best Man
Henry Fonda and Cliff Robertson play two men vying for the highest office in this comedy drama. 
Total Wins/Nominations: 1 nomination (Supporting Actor)
Other Awards/Nominations: WGA
Distributor: United Artists
Release Date: 5. April
Domestic Box Office: N/A
Budget: N/A
Current RT: N/A
Current IMDb: 7.7



The Americanization of Emily
Julie Andrews plays opposite James Garner as a free-wheeling naval officer. 
Total Wins/Nominations: 2 nominations (B&W Cinematography, AD)
Other Awards/Nominations: Laurel Awards (Drama) 2nd Place
Distributor: MGM
Release Date: 27. October
Domestic Box Office: N/A
Budget: N/A
Current RT: 100%
Current IMDb: 7.2

L’Homme de Rio (That Man from Rio)
French spy film.
Total Wins/Nominations: 1 nomination (Original Screenplay)
Other Awards/Nominations: N/A
Distributor: Lopert Pictures Corporation
Release Date: 8. June
Domestic Box Office: N/A
Budget: N/A
Current RT: N/A
Current IMDb: 7.2
The Knack…and How to Get It
London sex comedy.
Total Wins/Nominations: 0
Other Awards/Nominations: BAFTA, Cannes winner
Distributor: Lopert Pictures Corporation
Release Date: 29. June 1965
Domestic Box Office: $8M worldwide (IMDb)
Budget: $0.4M (IMDb)
Current RT: 78%
Current IMDb: 6.8

Hamlet
The Russian Prince of Demark. 
Total Wins/Nominations: 0
Other Awards/Nominations: BAFTA, Venice
Distributor: United Artists
Release Date: 15. March 1966
Domestic Box Office: N/A
Budget: N/A
Current RT:
Current IMDb: 8.3

Séance on a Wet Afternoon
A medium plots to have a child kidnapped, so she can legitimize her limited psychic powers. 
Total Wins/Nominations: 1 nomination (Actress)
Other Awards/Nominations: NBR
Distributor: Artixo Productions
Release Date: 5. November
Domestic Box Office: N/A
Budget: N/A
Current RT: 80%
Current IMDb: 8.0

The Chalk Garden
Mystery concerning a mother, her unmanageable daughter, and a governess. 
Total Wins/Nominations: 1 nomination (Supporting Actress)
Other Awards/Nominations: NBR, Golden Globe (Drama)
Distributor: Universal Pictures
Release Date: 21. May
Domestic Box Office: N/A
Budget: N/A
Current RT: N/A
Current IMDb: 7.4

Topkapi
International heist thriller.
Total Wins/Nominations: 1 win (Supporting Actor)
Other Awards/Nominations: NBR, Laurel Awards (Action-Drama) 4thPlace, WGA
Distributor: United Artists
Release Date: 17. September
Domestic Box Office:
Budget:
Current RT: 88%
Current IMDb: 7.0

The Pumpkin Eater
Marital drama involving Anne Bancroft playing a women with a penchant for pregnancies married to a philanderer played by Peter Finch. 
Total Wins/Nominations: 1 nomination (Actress)
Other Awards/Nominations: BAFTA, Cannes
Distributor: Royal Films International
Release Date: 9. November
Domestic Box Office: N/A
Budget: N/A
Current RT: N/A
Current IMDb: 7.2

The Girl with Green Eyes
May-December romance set in Dublin. 
Total Wins/Nominations: 0
Other Awards/Nominations: NBR, Venice
Distributor: Lopert Pictures Corporation
Release Date: 10. August
Domestic Box Office: N/A
Budget: N/A
Current RT: N/A
Current IMDb: 6.8

The Carpetbaggers
George Peppard plays a hardened tycoon in this drama.
Total Wins/Nominations: 0
Other Awards/Nominations: Laurel Awards (Drama) winner
Distributor: Paramount Pictures
Release Date: 9. April
Domestic Box Office: N/A
Budget: $3M (IMDb)
Current RT: 50%
Current IMDb: 6.3

The Pink Panther
Blake Edwards’ mystery comedy follows the exploits of Peter Sellers Inspector Clouseau. 
Total Wins/Nominations: 1 nomination (Score)
Other Awards/Nominations: Laurel Awards (Comedy) 2ndPlace, WGA
Distributor: United Artists
Release Date: 18. March
Domestic Box Office: $10.9M (IMDb)
Budget: N/A
Current RT: 90%
Current IMDb: 7.2

A Shot in the Dark
The follow-up to hugely successful The Pink Panther. 
Total Wins/Nominations: 0
Other Awards/Nominations: Laurel Awards (Comedy) 3rdPlace
Distributor: United Artists
Release Date: 23. June
Domestic Box Office: $12.4M (IMDb)
Budget: N/A
Current RT: 100%
Current IMDb: 7.5

The World of Henry Orient
Peter Sellers stars in this romantic comedy of errors. 
Total Wins/Nominations:
Other Awards/Nominations: NBR, Cannes, Golden Globe (Comedy), WGA
Distributor: United Artists
Release Date: 19. March
Domestic Box Office: N/A
Budget: N/A
Current RT: 88%
Current IMDb: 6.8

Dear Heart
Geraldine plays a spinster visiting New York City and crosses paths with a womanizer. 
Total Wins/Nominations: 1 nomination (Song)
Other Awards/Nominations: Golden Globe (Drama)
Distributor: Warner Bros. Pictures
Release Date: 2. December
Domestic Box Office: N/A
Budget: N/A
Current RT: N/A
Current IMDb: 7.0

The Finest Hours
Winston Churchill documentary.
Total Wins/Nominations: 1 nomination (Documentary)
Other Awards/Nominations: NBR
Distributor: Columbia Pictures
Release Date: 10. November
Domestic Box Office: N/A
Budget: N/A
Current RT: N/A
Current IMDb: 8.2

Four Days in November
Cuban missile crisis documentary. 
Total Wins/Nominations: 1 nomination (Documentary)
Other Awards/Nominations: NBR
Distributor: United Artists
Release Date: 7. October
Domestic Box Office: N/A
Budget: N/A
Current RT: N/A
Current IMDb: 7.7

Robin and the 7 Hoods
Prohibition-era musical starring members of the Rat Pack. 
Total Wins/Nominations: 2 nominations (Song, Adapted Score)
Other Awards/Nominations: Laurel Awards (Musical) 5thPlace, WGA
Distributor: Warner Bros. Pictures
Release Date: 24. June
Domestic Box Office: N/A
Budget: N/A
Current RT: 44%
Current IMDb: 6.3

What a Way to Go!
Black musical-comedy starring Shirley MacLaine as a woman obsessed with marriage and money. 
Total Wins/Nominations: 2 nominations (Color AD, Costumes)
Other Awards/Nominations: Laurel Awards (Comedy) 4thPlace
Distributor: TCFFC
Release Date: 12. May
Domestic Box Office: N/A
Budget: $20M (IMDb)
Current RT: 0%
Current IMDb: 6.7
Read More
Posted in Oscar Revisionism | No comments

Wednesday, December 5, 2012

The Lowest Common Snap Photographer

Posted on 7:15 PM by Unknown
Please excuse the non-movie-related posts lately, but I've entered a stream-of-consciousness mode, so please humor me.  As many you have heard, a freelance photographer took a picture of a man just before he was killed by an oncoming subway in New York City earlier this week.  Most persons, including myself, have an opinion on the matter, though it's difficult to have an informed specific stance, as all the details are not known.  What we do know is that one man pushed another man (who may have been inebriated and aggressive, which I'm unsure as to how it affected the outcome) into the pathway of the train during an altercation, which resulted in his death.  A photographer captured the moment before the subway ran him over and then sold the photo to New York Post, a newspaper owned by Rupert Murdoch and known for its tabloid leanings.  I've read arguments in lukewarm support of the photographer, as he is trained to instinctually capture moments as they are happening.  He's reported to have said he used the flash on his camera to alert the train of the helpless man's predicament   He would have been better off saying nothing.  For one, a flash was not used in every instance he took a picture (which may be explained away), but one only needs to look at the photo in question to notice how perfectly framed this "money" shot was.  To his defense, we have no idea at what point he entered the situation.  While my desire is to judge the guy for not dropping his camera and reaching out for the guy, I have to assume he wasn't in a position to be of any reasonable assistance.  While I'm playing armchair quarterback, I hope that if had I been there, and there was an opportunity, I would have reacted differently.  But, again, we don't know what transpired and how quickly.  It could have just as easily been the perfect storm of tragedy.  Yet, not seeing one hand reach from out from anyone, however fruitless, really stings and implicates all of us, does it not?



Setting that event aside, a transaction did result which involved the photographer actively selling the photo to the Post.  The photographer was complicit in financially benefiting from another man's death--as it was happening.  In my line of work (to pay the bills), which also involves sales, I often find myself compromising the ideal standards.  As far as I know, however, there isn't any decision which I make that involves the life or death of another person.  And, I would hope, regardless of the money involved, I would have the constitution to consider just what I was giving up for my gains.  I would hope.  To remind people that we live in a sick world where this can happen is not something I would want on my conscience.   Or would I?

But, even if you assume there was nothing the photographer could have done to save the man's life AND that a man has got to eat and pay the bills, there's the element of the Post, who had plenty of time to consider their options.  They are known for engaging in sensationalist journalism to boost the bottom-line.  Are there still not standards?  Is the public or greater good served in any way by being informed of this horrific act(s)?  Aren't we all aware of how dangerous subways can be, especially when pushed onto the tracks?  Unfortunate events occur all the time and some photos can needfully focus attention on war-time atrocities that take place, but the publishing of this photo strikes me as more insidious than informative.  Is one's impending death not private and sacred?  There's an inherent "entertainment value" in its existence that outweighs any social narrative at play, other than we need to take our own pulse and make sure there's still a heartbeat.  And, is there an argument out there that it was necessary for the photo to be displayed front and center?  I try to put myself in the shoes of those who know and/or loved him, and how they must feel seeing that photo.

YET, even if you excuse every aforementioned aspect of how this was handled (the photo being taken, sold, and printed on the front page), the final straw is really the headline, which includes, "This man is about to die," followed by "Doomed" in big block letters.  This is suggestive of a detachment void of any empathy; a calculated decision based on monetary motivation.  Money was to be made.  It's difficult to be viewed any other way.  Capitalism can be cold, but must it be this callous?

This photo splashed so visibly in the public sphere did nothing, but spark a conversation about we're willing to tolerate.  Frankly, I believe there is too much we allow.  Generally speaking, some say very little is sacred these days, the genie has left the bottle, and there is no going back.  I'm not sure if I agree.  But, this is a new low, and is reflective of what we as a society are willing to put up with.  I didn't write this post to make myself feel superior.  I wrote this post, because I didn't need to see this.  And, neither did those close to him.  The overall situation is just a tragedy squared.

You can contact the Post here to express your opinion on the matter.
Read More
Posted in Misc. | No comments

Tuesday, December 4, 2012

Second Verse, Same as the First!

Posted on 6:31 PM by Unknown
I just watched a commercial for the Words With Friends board game.  I've never played the internet sensation, which got Alec Baldwin and his temper into hot water briefly.  But, did you know there is a board game version now?  Um ... didn't it used to be called Scrabble?  LOL  Hope you're having a great week.
Read More
Posted in Misc. | No comments

Saturday, December 1, 2012

Best Supporting Actress 2012: Pimping Out the Gay Family Member

Posted on 12:56 PM by Unknown
An interesting (or not so) development has occurred in this year's Best Supporting Actress category: playing up the gay family member. Anne Hathaway, the frontrunner and eventual winner, has been vocal for quite some time about her gay brother Michael (she also has straight brother Thomas, who doesn't make for good copy, I guess). As she is Anne Hathaway, she did go a little over-the-top recently and received some flack for commenting on her new shorn appearance. "When I eventually looked in the mirror I just thought I looked like my gay brother," she told a New York audience during a private unveiling of Les Misérables Thanksgiving weekend. Now, she has two brothers. One would think she would refer to Michael as "her older brother," as most of us distinguish our siblings by age, if required. Or, if both of her brothers were older, by name, "my brother Michael." There's almost something backwoods about it: "that's curly-haired ginger brother; over there is Hefty Smurf; and, oh, that other one in the corner, he's my gay brother, but mama don't like to talk about that."  Hathaway, you love your brother Michael (and presumably Thomas), we get it.  Ultimately, you're doing a great thing by singling him out and creating more awareness.

Likely nominee Sally Field has three sons, the youngest, Sam Greisman, is also gay. He received attention recently for giving the (quite charming) introduction to her mom's HRC recognition.  His speech was hilarious and detailed the relationship hardships facing the gay son of Sally Field, which included meeting a blogger on a first-date and learning his site is called, "Shelby Drink Your Juice Dot Com."  Field has also gone on Oprah and has been spreading the word about Sam.  Ultimately, a good thing.

My more cynical side finds it suspect, but I'm glad that we live in a country where Hollywood actors are open about and proud of their gay family members. Has this happened before?  My memory sucks.  Even if it's just posturing (although, both ladies appear genuinely fond of their gays), this country has a lot of time to make up. And there are worse things on this planet then pimping your gay during Oscar season. One question: whose next? Does Amy Adams have a transgender cousin? Does Helen Hunt have a lesbian niece? Join the party! Bring it on!  Can't wait to see who is next.  Seriously.  
Read More
Posted in Anne Hathaway, Oscar 2012, Sally Field | No comments

Best Supporting Actress 2012: Anne's Still Winning, But Who Will She Be Up Against?

Posted on 1:35 AM by Unknown
Since the last time I posted about Anne Hathaway still winning an Oscar early next year, Les Misérables has screened for specially-coordinated audiences as well as critics.  The sentiment has been quite positive, with some even speculating that it may have overtaken Lincoln in the Best Picture race. There are also clips available from what may be the final cut.  People still debate whether or not Hathaway will win or even be nominated, which is to be expected.  This is a Oscar race.  Winners CAN'T be set in stone when they haven't even been NOMINATED yet, can they?  Oh, but they can.  It's not because I am a fanboy of Hathaway and/or Les Misérables.  Embarrassingly, I've never seen a production of the show.  I went to college while it was still riding fairly high, or, at least, was fresh enough in the minds of its fans or relevant enough to constantly populate the discussion of my college choir peers (I sang for one year, but providing a warm body and some volume would be more accurate descriptors; I went to a small school and they were simply short basses).  I'm familiar with only a handful of the songs, most particularly "Master of the House," which sometimes plays a part in the annual singalong I attend up north with family.  And, I've been very clear with my ambivalence towards Hathaway.

But, to use a tired expression, the unjinxable writing indeed is on the wall and has been there for some time.  It's not a matter of being right, either.  It's just so ... obvious.  I mean, we're talking about Hollywood here.  They aren't exactly in the business of being unpredictable most of the time.  With Hathaway, it's the right role (there's singing, it's live, and, hello, Catherine Zeta-Jones and Jennifer Hudson in the last ten years), right movie, right time in her career, right amount of paying dues, right amount of respected performances, right amount of box-office viability, right personal sacrifices (lopping off her hair, eating those oatmeal squares to drop those last of the twenty-five pounds), right personal elements (recent marriage), etc.  Ecstatic early word (which can always morph into something else entirely), and trailers that have been making many creams their pants (including myself) for months now.  Did I cover it all?  And, all of this, even if the movie underperforms.  I'm sure I'm missing something here.  Perhaps it's doubt, because there is none.  And, I WILL double-down even if things ever start looking slightly grim (which doesn't seem likely, but who knows), because, LOL, I love being right.  I wish I could place a bet of a lot of money on this, because I could really use the return on investment.  There is no tacit endorsement here of her performance (which I haven't seen) or person.  If Hathaway fails to win, the developing narrative (which, granted, I am perpetuating ... but, again, just by the circumstances, I would just be shocked if she didn't win) will have made a fool out of her (and me, but I think I like tempting the possibility) and I just don't see that happening.  And there really is no reaching for Nate Silver glory here, as I haven't been the only one making this prediction early on.  Though, I have to admit, the build-up to her victory has been fortunately measured, non?

The point of this post is really: who will fill up those four other slots?  Last time I posted, I was certain about Amy Adams (The Master) and Helen Hunt (The Sessions), like most, and threw in Samantha Barks (Les Misérables) and Jacki Weaver (Silver Linings Playbook) to round out the category.  Hunt is still Top Three, along with new addition Sally Field (Lincoln).  I can't imagine that changing, but we'll see what the critic and award bodies have in store.  As of yet, Hunt and Fields are Hathaway's strongest competition: two former winners whom the AMPAS are in no rush to ReOscar.  I would still place Adams in the #4 slot, but not entirely certain of her chances.  HOWEVER, surprisingly, I would retain Barks.  Had I posted a week or two ago, I may have left her off.  I found the promotional team behind Les Misérables was initially playing her down in order to play up Hathaway (and I even got a little conspiracy theory about it).  Now, ahem, if Barks knocks it out of the park, which is quite possible, seeing how she has lived the role on stage for quite some time, we could clearly witness a voter split, prompting me to imagine that somehow she is left out of the race to avoid the possibility.  But, I've bored myself, as this is all meaningless until we all have, at the very least, actually seen the film.

Weaver is still a possibility, because don't underestimate the power of The Weinstein, etc.  Her performance is quite understated.  Gold Derby has Maggie Smith in the fifth spot.  And there is always the possibility of surprise ... Amanda Seyfried, Kerry Washington, Frances McDormand, Jennifer Ehle, Pauline Collins, Rosemarie Dewitt (Promised Land or her technically lead turn in Your Sister's Sister), one of the gals from Hyde Park on the Hudson or Anna Karenina.  And, oh, yeah, a realistic shot Emily Blunt (Looper) and a seemingly far-fetched one (Ann Dowd).

I'll shut up now.  Thank you for putting up with me. It feels kind of lame prognosticating at this point, especially when there are others who have seen every film in contention. #jealous

[UPDATE 12/1: Looks like I spoke too soon]
Read More
Posted in Oscar 2012 | No comments
Newer Posts Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Movie Spoiler THE INTERNATIONAL (2009) starring Clive Owen, Naomi Watts
    Have you caught Cloud Atlas yet? If not, you should do yourself a favor and check out the imperfect, yet sweeping meditation on love, choi...
  • Movie Spoiler THE SKELETON KEY (preceded by capsule review)
    The Skeleton Key , the title of which is a red herring attempt to suggest a mysterious tone, is one of those nothing special films you may h...
  • Movie Spoiler: The Silence of the Lambs
    Part of my original agenda for this blog was to finish out a few things that I started.  One of them was the Oscar Revisionism series, which...
  • Movie Spoiler THE PAPERBOY (2012) - after review
    I caught The Paperboy the other night. The uneventful lengths I went to see it are detailed here . I was pretty excited to see something ...
  • Movie Spoiler HOPE SPRINGS (2012) starring Meryl Streep - after review
    In Meryl Streep's latest film Hope Springs , she plays Kay, a middle-class wife and mother from the Baby Boom generation. But, just beca...
  • Movie Spoiler DOLORES CLAIBORNE (1995) starring Kathy Bates - after review
    Dolores Claiborne: Movie Spoiler Summary (after capsule review).  Thanks to the success of Kathy Bates' Best Actress Oscar-winning turn ...
  • Movie Spoiler THE MASTER (2012) starring Joaquin Phoenix - after review
    It has been five years since the release of PT Anderson’s There Will Be Blood . His films, whether you like them or not, are well-crafted a...
  • Norbit: Movie Spoiler Summary
    Six years ago, after over twenty-five years in the business, Eddie Murphy received his very first Oscar nomination for Dreamgirls as Jimmy....
  • Happy Birthday Suit: Cameron Diaz
    I fell behind on the Happy Birthday Suit(less) series.  Its days are numbered anyway, so to speak, since I'm only focusing on post-World...
  • Movie Spoiler Summary: UNTHINKABLE
    Unthinkable concerns an interrogator who uses questionable techniques on a Muslim man who may or may have not planted three strategically-pl...

Categories

  • 2011 Film Review (2)
  • 2012 Film Review (35)
  • 2012 Hola Mexico Film Festival (2)
  • 2012 Hollywood Fringe Festival (17)
  • 2012 Movie Review (10)
  • 2013 (1)
  • 68 Cent (1)
  • Actress Retrospective (30)
  • AHF (1)
  • Ahmanson (1)
  • Al Pacino (1)
  • Amanda Bynes (1)
  • Amanda Seyfried (1)
  • Amy Adams (2)
  • An Evening With ... (1)
  • Angelina Jolie (3)
  • Animated Feature (1)
  • Anne Hathaway (13)
  • Annette Bening (3)
  • Arbitrage (1)
  • Barbra Streisand (1)
  • Best Actor (2)
  • Best Actor 2013 (2)
  • Best Actress (18)
  • Best Actress 2012 (9)
  • Best Actress 2013 (39)
  • Best Actress 2014 (1)
  • Best Adapted Screenplay (2)
  • Best Animated Feature (1)
  • Best Director (5)
  • Best Documentary (1)
  • Best Documentary Short (1)
  • Best Live Action Short (1)
  • Best Original Screenplay (3)
  • Best Picture (10)
  • Best Sound Editing (1)
  • Best Sound Mixing (1)
  • Best Supporting Actor (1)
  • Best Supporting Actor 2013 (2)
  • Best Supporting Actress 2013 (5)
  • Box Office (1)
  • bradley cooper (1)
  • Brooke Shields (1)
  • Cameron Diaz (1)
  • Cannes 2012 (1)
  • Carey Mulligan (1)
  • Casting (2)
  • Cate Blanchett (4)
  • Catherine Zeta-Jones (1)
  • Charlize Theron (2)
  • Cher (1)
  • Chloë Sevigny (1)
  • Cinematography (1)
  • Claire Danes (1)
  • Costume Design (1)
  • Czech (1)
  • Dakota Fanning (1)
  • Dan Johnson Review (8)
  • Daniel Day-Lewis (2)
  • Demi Moore (1)
  • Denzel Washington (1)
  • Diane Keaton (1)
  • Editing (1)
  • Elaine Stritch (1)
  • Elizabeth Olsen (1)
  • Elizabeth Reaser (1)
  • Ellen Barkin (1)
  • Emily Blunt (1)
  • Emma Thompson (2)
  • Emma Watson (2)
  • Faye Dunaway (1)
  • Felicity Jones (1)
  • Film Review (8)
  • Frances McDormand (1)
  • Gay (3)
  • Geffen Playhouse (1)
  • Glenn Close (2)
  • goldie hawn (1)
  • Greta Gerwig (1)
  • Gwyneth Paltrow (1)
  • Halle Berry (1)
  • Helen Hunt (4)
  • Helena Bonham Carter (1)
  • Hilary Swank (3)
  • Hit Me with Your Best Shot (15)
  • HIV Awareness Month July (1)
  • Holly Hunter (3)
  • Interview (5)
  • Jacki Weaver (5)
  • Jennifer Aniston (1)
  • Jennifer Garner (1)
  • Jennifer Grey (1)
  • Jennifer Lawrence (8)
  • Jessica Biel (1)
  • Jessica Chastain (3)
  • Jessica Lange (1)
  • Joaquin Phoenix (1)
  • Jodie Foster (2)
  • Jonah Hill (1)
  • Judi Dench (2)
  • Julia Roberts (4)
  • Julianne Moore (2)
  • Julie Christie (1)
  • Julie Delpy (1)
  • Kate Beckinsale (2)
  • Kate Winslet (2)
  • Katie Holmes (2)
  • Kaya Scodelario (1)
  • Keira Knightley (2)
  • Keri Russell (1)
  • Kirsten Dunst (1)
  • Kristen Stewart (3)
  • Kristen Wiig (2)
  • L.A. Pix (2)
  • LA Film Festival (4)
  • LA Film Festival 2012 (3)
  • Lena Olin (1)
  • Leonardo DiCaprio (1)
  • Lindsay Lohan (2)
  • Los Angeles (1)
  • Maggie Gyllenhaal (1)
  • Margo Martindale (1)
  • Marion Cotillard (2)
  • Mark Ruffalo (1)
  • Mary Elizabeth Winstead (1)
  • Matthew McConaughey (1)
  • Meryl Streep (5)
  • Michelle Pfeiffer (1)
  • Mila Kunis (2)
  • Misc. (21)
  • Movie Posters (1)
  • Movie Spoiler (55)
  • Naomi Watts (3)
  • Natalie Portman (2)
  • Newport Beach Film Festival (1)
  • Nicholas Jarecki (1)
  • Nicole Kidman (12)
  • Opening This Weekend (14)
  • Opening Title Sequence (8)
  • Oscar (8)
  • Oscar 2012 (29)
  • Oscar 2013 (31)
  • Oscar Outlook 2012 (11)
  • Oscar Predictions (3)
  • Oscar Preview (5)
  • Oscar Revisionism (23)
  • Outfest 2012 (3)
  • Outfest Review (6)
  • Page to Screen (17)
  • Predictions (2)
  • Previews (31)
  • Production Design (1)
  • Rachel McAdams (1)
  • Rachel Weisz (1)
  • Reader Request Review (1)
  • Reese Witherspoon (1)
  • ReOscaring (2)
  • Review (1)
  • Richard Gere (1)
  • Robin Weigert (1)
  • Robin Wright (1)
  • Rosie O'Donnell (1)
  • Sally Field (2)
  • Sally Hawkins (1)
  • Sally Kirkland (1)
  • Samantha Morton (1)
  • Sandra Bullock (2)
  • Scarlett Johansson (1)
  • Scene By Scene (1)
  • Score (1)
  • Screenplay Review (1)
  • Script Review (13)
  • Shailene Woodley (1)
  • Shirley MacLaine (2)
  • Sigourney Weaver (1)
  • Sissy Spacek (1)
  • SNL (12)
  • Spoiler Summary (2)
  • Susan Sarandon (1)
  • Sweepstakes (1)
  • Theatre Review (55)
  • Tina Fey (1)
  • Tom Cruise (3)
  • Trailers (10)
  • TV (1)
  • Vanessa Redgrave (1)
  • Viola Davis (1)
  • Whoopi Goldberg (1)
  • Winona Ryder (1)
  • Zoe Saldana (1)

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (171)
    • ▼  September (5)
      • Oscar 2013: The Secret Life of Walter Mitty (spoil...
      • Oscar 2013: Grace of Monaco (spoilers)
      • Oscar 2013: Rush (spoilers)
      • Spotlight on Focus Features or Are We Underestimat...
      • Oscar 2013: August: Osage County (spoilers)
    • ►  August (6)
    • ►  July (6)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (12)
    • ►  April (36)
    • ►  March (9)
    • ►  February (52)
    • ►  January (42)
  • ►  2012 (329)
    • ►  December (27)
    • ►  November (22)
    • ►  October (30)
    • ►  September (21)
    • ►  August (9)
    • ►  July (30)
    • ►  June (59)
    • ►  May (56)
    • ►  April (51)
    • ►  March (24)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile